Sport-By-Sport Pricing Pages

Each sport in this report now has its own page with the numbers, context, and FAQs for that league:

Updated 2026-07-21 by David Reilich. Data window: 2026-07-14 through 2026-07-21, with the ending timestamp excluded.

Quick Answer

This week’s PropsBot pricing report found 902 comparable exact-line prop points across 1 sport group that cleared the minimum-data gate. Every comparison holds the player, event, market, side, and prop point constant, then measures the distance between the best and worst posted break-even probability near 90 minutes before start.

The report covers NFL, WNBA, UFC and combat sports, KBO and NPB baseball, soccer, tennis, PGA golf, and esports when each group has enough comparable prices. A sport that misses the gate stays labeled as insufficient data instead of receiving a made-up trend.

Download the aggregate CSV, JSON, method notes, and SHA-256 manifest. The package excludes raw prices, player names, events, prop points, and credentials.

Weekly Results

Sport Exact-line points Books Over median Over p90 Under median Under p90 Gate
NFL 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a Insufficient data
WNBA 902 5 2.119 4.452 1.691 3.487 Passed
UFC and combat sports 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a Insufficient data
KBO and NPB baseball 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a Insufficient data
Soccer 4 3 9.819 17.627 n/a n/a Insufficient data
Tennis 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a Insufficient data
PGA golf 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a Insufficient data
Esports 0 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a Insufficient data

All gaps are percentage points of raw implied probability. A larger number means identical outcomes carried more different break-even requirements across the books in this cohort. It does not prove which side was correct.

NFL Pricing Study

NFL did not clear the publication gate this week. The source produced 0 eligible exact-line points and 0 side-level comparisons. PropsBot requires at least 20 of each cohort before reporting a sport-level distribution.

This is a deliberate no-result, not a zero. The market may be out of season, lightly posted, or using different prop points across books. The NFL owner remains the right place to check live availability.

WNBA Pricing Study

This edition found 902 exact-line prop points across 5 books for WNBA. The median over-side price gap was 2.119 implied-probability points, and the 90th percentile was 4.452. On unders, the median was 1.691 and the 90th percentile was 3.487. The most frequently comparable market key was player_points, with 328 side-level observations.

Those numbers describe the fixed weekly cohort, not every market in the sport. Different lines were excluded, so the comparison does not reward a cheaper price attached to a worse threshold. Use the WNBA research owner for the current slate, then verify the exact line and price before acting.

UFC and combat sports Pricing Study

UFC and combat sports did not clear the publication gate this week. The source produced 0 eligible exact-line points and 0 side-level comparisons. PropsBot requires at least 20 of each cohort before reporting a sport-level distribution.

This is a deliberate no-result, not a zero. The market may be out of season, lightly posted, or using different prop points across books. The UFC and combat sports owner remains the right place to check live availability.

KBO and NPB baseball Pricing Study

KBO and NPB baseball did not clear the publication gate this week. The source produced 0 eligible exact-line points and 0 side-level comparisons. PropsBot requires at least 20 of each cohort before reporting a sport-level distribution.

This is a deliberate no-result, not a zero. The market may be out of season, lightly posted, or using different prop points across books. The KBO and NPB baseball owner remains the right place to check live availability.

Soccer Pricing Study

Soccer did not clear the publication gate this week. The source produced 4 eligible exact-line points and 4 side-level comparisons. PropsBot requires at least 20 of each cohort before reporting a sport-level distribution.

This is a deliberate no-result, not a zero. The market may be out of season, lightly posted, or using different prop points across books. The Soccer owner remains the right place to check live availability.

Tennis Pricing Study

Tennis did not clear the publication gate this week. The source produced 0 eligible exact-line points and 0 side-level comparisons. PropsBot requires at least 20 of each cohort before reporting a sport-level distribution.

This is a deliberate no-result, not a zero. The market may be out of season, lightly posted, or using different prop points across books. The Tennis owner remains the right place to check live availability.

PGA golf Pricing Study

PGA golf did not clear the publication gate this week. The source produced 0 eligible exact-line points and 0 side-level comparisons. PropsBot requires at least 20 of each cohort before reporting a sport-level distribution.

This is a deliberate no-result, not a zero. The market may be out of season, lightly posted, or using different prop points across books. The PGA golf owner remains the right place to check live availability.

Esports Pricing Study

Esports did not clear the publication gate this week. The source produced 0 eligible exact-line points and 0 side-level comparisons. PropsBot requires at least 20 of each cohort before reporting a sport-level distribution.

This is a deliberate no-result, not a zero. The market may be out of season, lightly posted, or using different prop points across books. The Esports owner remains the right place to check live availability.

Methodology Summary

  1. Select pregame sportsbook snapshots in the fixed seven-day UTC window.
  2. Keep captures made 60 to 120 minutes before the scheduled start.
  3. Match the exact sport, event, market, player, and prop point.
  4. For each book, retain the observation nearest 90 minutes before start; the earlier capture wins an exact tie.
  5. Require at least two books and a maximum five-minute span across selected captures.
  6. Convert American odds to raw implied probability and analyze over and under separately.
  7. Report the maximum-minus-minimum difference and publish a sport group only after at least 20 exact-line points and 20 side comparisons pass.

This is the same identity discipline used in PropsBot’s original line-shopping study. The weekly report expands the cadence and sport coverage without changing the meaning of the measure.

What This Report Does Not Claim

How To Use And Cite The Data

Use the report to show why price belongs beside every prediction. Normalize the current odds with the odds converter, compare identical offers in Odds Shopping Edge, and recalculate when the market moves.

Suggested citation: PropsBot.AI, Weekly Sportsbook Pricing Report, edition ending 2026-07-21, version 1.0.0. Retain the exact-line rule, T-90 timing, seven-day window, and aggregate-only disclosure. The broader press and data hub links PropsBot’s methodology and research record.

This report is for research and education. Sports betting involves risk, and a historical price difference does not guarantee a future result.

Embed or Cite This Report

\n

Publishers, betting media and analysts may cite or republish figures from this report at no charge, with attribution. Two requirements: link back to this page as the source, and do not alter the numbers. The downloadable data package (aggregate CSV, JSON, method notes and SHA-256 manifest) is available above and is the preferred citation source.

\n

Suggested citation: PropsBot.AI Weekly Sportsbook Pricing Report, data window 2026-07-14 to 2026-07-21. https://propsbot.ai/weekly-sportsbook-pricing-report/

\n

HTML for embeds:

\n

<p>Source: <a href="https://propsbot.ai/weekly-sportsbook-pricing-report/">PropsBot.AI Weekly Sportsbook Pricing Report</a> \u2014 exact-line prop pricing compared across US sportsbooks.</p>

\n

Media inquiries and custom data cuts (per sport, per book, per market): contact the PropsBot team. Embargoed early looks at upcoming reports are available to accredited betting media on request.

\n”